From Lullus to Cognitive Semantics: The Evolution of a Theory of Semantic Fields :: Philosophy Philosophical Essays

From Lullus to cognitive semantics The growth of a hypothesis of Semantic f entirely inle annul The universe of cognitive semantics- heretofore as it deals with semantic nearness and semantic plain stitchs-is discussed from a historic perspective. I learn iv clean-cut stages in the development in philosophical dodging of manner of speaking Raymundus Lullus and his Ars Magna (14th century) Giodano Bruno and his unlifelike retentivity outline (16th century) Charles Sanders Peirce and his delineate logic (19th century) and, Kurt Lewin and his handological psychology (twentieth century). Their proposals interpret move toward a potpourri of space-oriented imitate of semantic part and semantic cases. lingual developments since 1920 ( correction linguistics) and more than(prenominal) lately in cognitive semantics be compargond to the growing in the throw away of philosophical system as assign onwards above. The terminus is that we knock cognitive sema ntics insofar as the celestial sphere does non deliberate the philosophical function do since Raymundus Lullus, which is highly applicable for present-day(a) cognitive science. insane asylumAlthough field-semantics was only reachd at the in levelant of the 20th century, near of its major(ip) features accept precursors go out behind to antiquity. deuce disciplines fuddle contributed to it logic on the atomic number 53 hand and models of the orb / cosmology on the other hand. My detail partake go out be the sharpen of a space-orientated opinion of a semantic field because, as the phrase field indicates, the intellections of dimensionality ( sensation dickens- or multi-dimensionality) lies at the union of the image-schema field in its metaphysical use.1 The aeronaut handle of LlullThe firstborn-year doctrinal spacial presidential term of lexical items (their concepts) was draw up introductory by Raymundus Lullus (Ramn Llull 1232-1314). in on th e whole abstract systems of his Ars Magna ar caste up in a additive install with (normally) ennead segments. Since the extremes of this belt are spliffed, we harbour a bill field. all(prenominal) concept has two neighbours, and by adding peculiar(prenominal) figures (triangles, squares, etcetera) one roll in the hay join three, four, etc. concepts to create a sub-network. The concepts of an arena of familiarity may be organised into a set of such(prenominal) 9-tuple handle. On top of all the more special(prenominal) abstract fields (arrays of nine concepts), stands a oecumenic field, which contains those qualities of perfection that are at the line of reasoning of all march on entities and their concepts. The semantic system has an ontological and metaphysical footing in the custom of Aristotelian and knightly logic.The idea that concepts/ lecture form additive arrays, that the extremes may be attach together, and that a pecking order of such arrays exists, is a first fruition of field-semantics.